Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Crime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Crime. Show all posts

Friday, October 9, 2026

The Sunbeam Hotel – Corner Riley & Albion Streets – Surry Hills – The 1945 Shooting

The Sunbeam Hotel stood on the corner of Riley Street and Albion Street in Surry Hills, right at the top of the old Frog Hollow. It was a Tooth & Co. pub with a hard reputation, and on Tuesday 10 April 1945, just after six o'clock closing, two local men were shot dead in its public bar. Arthur Graham and Cecil Miller died on the bar-room floor within seconds. The man with the gun was Francis Alexander Walls, a 46-year-old Army cook in uniform, who had a Japanese pistol his son had brought home from New Guinea. He was charged with double murder, but a jury convicted him only of manslaughter, and Mr Justice Herron sent him to gaol for four years. The pub closed in the 1950s and was pulled down, and the corner it overlooked is now Frog Hollow Reserve.

If you've ever cut across Frog Hollow Reserve with the dog, you'd never guess a pub stood on that corner, let alone one the soldier in this story called "a low dive". So I went digging in the old newspapers to see what really happened at the Sunbeam that night in 1945, and what sort of place it was.

Children playing in Hills Reserve, Frog Hollow, Surry Hills, in 1949, with old weatherboard houses and a sandstone wall behind
Kids playing in Hills Reserve, the cleared ground of old Frog Hollow, in 1949. This is the hollow the Sunbeam looked down on from the corner of Riley and Albion Streets. Ted Hood, State Library of New South Wales, no known copyright restrictions, via Wikimedia Commons

Where the Sunbeam Stood

The Sunbeam was on the corner of Riley and Albion Streets, Surry Hills. The Sydney Morning Herald of 11 April 1945 put it exactly that way: "the Sunbeam Hotel, at the corner of Riley and Albion Streets, Surry Hills". The City of Sydney Archives has a Town Clerk's file from 1929–30 headed "Frog Hollow resumption. Demolition of party wall. 'Sunbeam' Hotel, 317 Riley Street. Tooth & Co.", so its street address was 317 Riley Street. A council deed packet dated 6 March 1930 covers the same party wall. Some reports called it the Sunbeam in Riley Street and one picture caption put it in Albion Street, but it's the same pub on the same corner.

It had a door facing Albion Street, with steps down to the footpath. That's the door the soldier ran out of in 1945.

Frog Hollow next door

The Sunbeam's big neighbour was Frog Hollow. According to the City of Sydney's history of Frog Hollow Reserve, the hollow was a pocket of land bounded by Anne, Albion, Riley and Little Riley Streets, sitting about nine metres below the surrounding streets. You could only get into it from three directions, down steep flights of stone steps. Between 1895 and 1904 it was known as "one of the most depraved areas of Sydney", and the police said it had bred some of the most "desperate and dangerous criminals" they'd come across. One of them was Samuel "Jewey" Freeman, the leader of the Riley Street Gang.

The council finally moved in with slum clearance. The first houses to go, at 295 to 315 Riley Street, were demolished in 1925. Going by the street numbers, that row ran right up to the Sunbeam at number 317. The council's 1929–30 file about demolishing the hotel's party wall suggests the pub was left standing on the corner while its neighbours came down. Part of the cleared land became a council depot and part became a park called Hills Reserve, named after Pat Hills, the alderman who later became Lord Mayor. Today it's Frog Hollow Reserve, at 303 to 307 Riley Street on the corner of Albion Street.

I wrote about the hollow itself years ago in my Frog Hollow – Albion St & Riley St – Surry Hills post.

A Tooth & Co. Pub with a Hard Name

I couldn't find a full run of licensees for the Sunbeam in the papers I could get at, so I'll stick to what I can back up.

  • Built: Elliot Lindsay, writing for Neighbourhood Media in 2024, says the hotel was built in 1865. I haven't seen that date in a primary source, so treat it as his.
  • Owner: It was a Tooth & Co. house. In July 1930, the City of Sydney's legal opinion books recorded a matter headed "Sunbeam Hotel. Albion & Riley Sts. Tooth & Co. Ltd. Evan's Place. Easement of light and air." The Noel Butlin Archives Centre at the ANU holds Tooth & Co.'s yellow card for the "Sunbeam Hotel, Riley Street, Surry Hills" (about the 1920s to the 1950s), as well as the brewery's property office file on the hotel from 1930 to 1957.
  • Licensee in 1945: Eric Stapleton. His wife, Mrs Louise Stapleton, and her sister, Mrs Vera Porter, worked the bar.

Pub historian Mick Roberts, writing on his Time Gents site in 2023, called the Sunbeam the suburb's "most infamous of 'blood houses'", and wrote that its history "is littered with violent incidents". His article includes a photograph of the hotel taken in September 1948 by Ivan Ive, held by the State Library of NSW. It's a great picture, but it isn't free to reuse, so I've linked his article in the sources rather than putting it here.

A woman in an apron standing in the doorway of a corner grocery covered in hand-painted price signs, Riley and Fitzroy Streets, 1934
The corner store at Riley and Fitzroy Streets, further up Riley Street, during the Depression "bread wars" of August 1934. This is the Riley Street the Sunbeam's regulars knew. Sam Hood, State Library of New South Wales, public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Six O'Clock and No More Beer

To understand what happened, you need to know how drinking worked in Sydney in 1945. Six o'clock closing had come in during the First World War, and pubs in New South Wales stopped serving at 6 pm until 1955. Plenty of men knocked off work at five and had an hour to get as much beer into themselves as they could. That was the "six o'clock swill". On top of that, beer was short in the last years of the war, and when a pub's beer was gone, it was gone. Four days after the shooting, a man on the Sunbeam's front steps told two would-be customers there was "no beer in the hotel" at all.

A barmaid pulling beers in a crowded Sydney hotel bar at 6 pm in 1941
A barmaid at work at six o'clock at Petty's Hotel, Sydney, in 1941. This was the six o'clock rush at its worst, and it's the moment the trouble started at the Sunbeam. Max Dupain, public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Tuesday 10 April 1945

The afternoon

Francis Alexander Walls was a private in the Australian Military Forces (A.M.F.) and worked as an Army cook. Most papers gave his age as 46, although the Canberra Times said 40. He'd been in the Army about five years. According to Mrs Stapleton at the inquest, he came into the bar at about 3 pm and was drinking with a civilian. That civilian was his son, who was also named Francis Alexander Walls and had since been discharged from the Army. The Age also said the soldier had been in the hotel since about three o'clock. In the statement read to the jury at his trial, though, Walls said he'd been drinking all afternoon and only went to the Sunbeam shortly before 6 pm.

Walls told Detective-Sergeant Oswald Millgate why he had a loaded pistol on him: "I had to deliver some tobacco to a cove there. I knew it was a low dive of a place, a cosmopolitan sort of a place. They get funny down there sometimes, and draw knives, so I took the pistol with me." (Truth, 1 July 1945)

Also in the bar that afternoon were two Surry Hills locals:

  • Arthur John Graham, 31, a City Council cleaner from Griffin Street, Surry Hills. He was married.
  • Cecil Miller, an ironworker from Bennett Place, Surry Hills. The Herald said he was 35 and married, with three sons aged two, four and six and an adopted daughter of 18. The Age, the Canberra Times and the Northern Star gave his age as 45.

Six o'clock

At 6 pm the main bar door was shut. According to the Herald, all but seven men left when they were asked, and one of the seven was in an Australian soldier's uniform. Mrs Stapleton told the Herald that night:

"The soldier had been drinking for some time, and at 6 p.m. I told him that the beer was off and that he had better leave. He asked: 'Aren't you going to serve me?' and when I replied 'No' he became abusive. He said, 'I've got something here that will fix the lot of you,' at the same time pointing to his pocket. He then said something insulting to me." (Sydney Morning Herald, 11 April 1945)

She said Graham and Miller got up off the form along the wall and told him to "break it down" and not to repeat what he'd said. A fight broke out and the soldier was knocked to the floor. At the inquest her account was a bit different. She said the soldier asked for two middies, and when she wouldn't answer him he abused her, and then "Bill Flanagan and Cecil Miller spoke to the soldier and told him to break it down". In that version, the soldier swung at Miller and missed, Miller hit back, and the soldier ended up on the floor.

William Flanagan, a sheet-metal worker from Riley Street, told the coroner he'd asked the soldier not to talk that way in front of women. He said Miller told him, "Be your age and go. There's no more beer."

The shots

The licensee, Eric Stapleton, was down in the cellar. What happened next took only a few seconds. From the floor, the soldier pulled out the pistol and two shots were fired. One bullet went into Graham's right temple and the other hit Miller in the body (the inquest heard it was his chest). The Herald said both men "slumped to the bar floor and died in a few seconds". It put the time at five minutes past six.

Not everyone heard it the same way. Flanagan told the coroner: "There was bang, bang, bang, bang. I thought there were about 14 shots." Every other account, and the evidence about the two dead men, comes back to two shots. The taxi driver George Brian Courtney, who said he was also known as Brian Hunt, said he saw a flash, heard a report, and saw the soldier turn his head. "I thought I might be the next one to get it, so I jumped over the bar. I heard another shot fired as I was going over."

Out the Albion Street door

In the confusion the soldier got to his feet and ran out the door facing Albion Street, leaving his hat on the floor. The Age said he left his kit bag behind too. As he went down the steps, two of the men in the bar tried to grab him, and one threw a beer glass that smashed against the brickwork of the doorway.

Within minutes the hotel was full of detectives. The Herald named Detective-Superintendents Wickham and James, Detective-Inspector G. Smith, Detective-Sergeants Milgate, Lynch, Gordon and Aldridge, and Detective Kelly. They put out a description of a man aged 40 to 43, 5 ft 7 in, thin to medium build, with a dark to olive complexion and an Australian soldier's uniform.

The Daily Mirror of 11 April ran photographs of "the spot in the bar where the fatal shots were fired", along with Mrs Louise Stapleton and Mrs Vera Porter. You can see the page through the Trove link in the sources.

A Japanese Nambu Type 14 pistol made in 1943, shown with its leather holster
A Japanese Nambu Type 14 service pistol made in 1943, with its holster. The 1945 papers only call Walls' gun a Japanese automatic or service pistol. This is just an example of the type soldiers brought home from New Guinea, not the gun itself. Chris.w.braun, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

The Arrest

He didn't get far. The Canberra Times reported that at 2 am the police arrested "Francis Alexander Walls, 40, A.M.F., at a house in Riley Street". At the inquest, Detective-Sergeant Millgate said he saw Walls at his home in Darley Street, Surry Hills, and that the soldier told him:

"I'm glad you've come. I couldn't sleep. I'm pleased to get it over." (Truth, 1 July 1945)

According to Millgate, Walls said one of the men had knocked him down and he'd tried to defend himself, saying "Give us a go; don't kick me." He said one of the men said "I'll kick you to death", and that he fired but didn't aim at anyone.

On Wednesday morning, 11 April, Walls appeared in uniform at the Central Police Court before Mr Farrington, S.M. He was charged with murdering Cecil Miller and Arthur Graham and with having an unlicensed Japanese automatic pistol. Sergeant Moulden, the police prosecutor, asked for a remand to 19 April. Bail was refused.

Four Days Later, More Trouble

If anybody thought the Sunbeam would settle down after that, they were wrong. On Saturday 14 April, two men came up to an employee who was sitting on the hotel steps minding the place while the licensee was out. The hotel doors were open but no drinks were being served. According to the Daily Mirror, they wanted beer. According to the Sun, it was a bottle of wine. When he told them they couldn't get any, one of them grabbed him, pulled a revolver and poked it into his stomach. He broke free, ran inside and slammed the door. Detective-Sergeant Windsor and Detective Perry later charged two men with assault.

The Sun put it under the heading "Sunbeam Hotel in limelight again". The same article reported three more shootings in New South Wales that day, one of them a bank teller hit when his own gun fell, which gives you an idea of how many guns were around at the end of the war.

A group of barefoot children in a narrow inner-Sydney lane lined with brick walls and paling fences, 1949
Children in an inner-city lane in 1949, from Ted Hood's series on the slums of Surry Hills, Woolloomooloo and Redfern. Ted Hood, State Library of New South Wales, no known copyright restrictions, via Wikimedia Commons

The Inquest

The inquest was held at the City Coroner's Court before the Acting-Coroner, Mr Austin. Walls was defended by Mr Dovey, K.C., and Mr J. Bruxner, instructed by Niland and Bohane.

Truth's report of the first sitting, published on 27 May 1945, had some telling evidence:

  • The Government Medical Officer, Dr Stratford Sheldon, said blood tests showed Miller had been "slightly under the influence" and Graham "affected to a much greater degree".
  • Detective-Constable B. Toms said both Miller and Graham were known to the police.
  • Asked whether Graham was "pretty full and pretty cranky", Courtney said "Yes". He said Miller seemed sober to him.
  • Mrs Stapleton said Graham had had a quarrel during the afternoon, but not with the soldier, and that it had blown over. When Mr Dovey asked whether anyone kicked the soldier on the floor, she said, "No, no one kicked him."

Truth printed her name as "Mrs. Mary Stapleton" in that report, but every other report, including Truth's own later one, calls her Louise.

The inquest was adjourned to 6 June, and Walls was remanded again without bail. When it finished, Truth reported on 1 July that the Acting-Coroner had found Walls murdered both men and committed him for trial. Mr Dovey argued that at most a jury would convict him of manslaughter, but bail was refused again. At one point Mr Dovey complained that Mrs Stapleton and Mrs Porter seemed to treat the proceedings as entertainment and were giggling, and both women were ordered out of the court.

The son's evidence

Walls' son, the younger Francis Alexander Walls, told the coroner he'd been in the Sunbeam with his father. In his telling, after a few words at the bar a man in the corner said "Cut it out", and then "they rushed over to my father and started punching and pushing him". He said one of them knocked his father down with a left hook, and that Miller and Graham stood over him "in a half crouched position. I saw movement as though they were kicking him." Then the first shot went off and one man fell. The other man went at his father with his arm up, the second shot went off, and he fell too.

About the gun, he said: "I brought it down from New Guinea and gave it to my father, with some ammunition, as a souvenir." And outside the hotel, he said, his father told him, "I had to do it, otherwise they would have kicked me to death."

Millgate agreed that several of the men in the hotel at the time were known to the police, and said Walls himself had an unblemished record.

Royal coat of arms on the sandstone pediment of Darlinghurst Court House at sunset
Darlinghurst Court House, where the Central Criminal Court sat. Walls was tried here in September 1945. Sardaka, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

The Trial

Walls went on trial at the Central Criminal Court on Monday 3 September 1945. He pleaded not guilty to murdering Arthur Graham, and the Crown said he fired two shots from a Japanese pistol, one of which killed Graham instantly. The reports I found are all about the Graham charge. I didn't find what became of the separate charge over Cecil Miller's death, so I'll leave that open.

Walls' statement was read to the jury, and the Herald summed it up the next day. He said he was knocked down and "kicked four times in the face and head". He thought he was going to be killed and said "Give me a chance", and someone answered, "You'll get no chance, we'll kick you to death." He drew the pistol, someone grabbed him, and "the next instant he heard the pistol explode". He said, "I did not aim at anyone," and that what he did was in self-defence.

On Tuesday 4 September the jury acquitted him of murder and found him guilty of the manslaughter of Arthur John Graham. He was remanded for sentence.

Four years

Mr Justice Herron passed sentence the following week. Truth reported it on 16 September 1945 under the heading "Guns Menace To Society":

"I am determined to put down the carrying of loaded firearms ... whether they be souvenirs of this war or not." (Truth, 16 September 1945)

He gave Walls four years' gaol. The judge told him, "I don't regard you as belonging to the criminal class," and said the police shared that view. He praised Walls' five years in the Army and his family's service, and said that without those things he'd have felt "impelled to have made the sentence much heavier". He also said Graham had a criminal record and that "he and his friends might have made a serious assault upon you". But in his view, "the worst factor of the case was that you took a loaded pistol into a crowded hotel." He said that if Walls behaved himself in gaol he'd be willing to recommend an early release, on condition that Walls left Sydney and kept away from drink.

The Maitland Mercury of 15 September also reported four years. Elliot Lindsay's 2024 article says Walls got seven years on 12 September 1945, but both 1945 newspaper reports I found say four years, so I've gone with those.

Surry Hills at the End of the War

The Sunbeam shooting wasn't a gang killing. It was a pub brawl at closing time with a souvenir gun in the mix. But it happened at a violent time in Surry Hills. In a 2022 piece for Murders Most Foul, Elliot Lindsay describes a gangland war across Sydney, with more than a dozen deaths that peaked between December 1944 and May 1945, much of it in Surry Hills and Darlinghurst. He lists the Sunbeam shooting among the violence of those months. According to Lindsay, the old razor-gang figures of the 1920s were mostly dead or in prison by 1939, and a new crowd had moved in on the wartime money from sly grog and vice.

The Americans were a big part of that. Lindsay writes that African-American servicemen were steered towards Surry Hills and Darlinghurst, and that Durham Hall at 207 Albion Street became the Booker T. Washington Club for Black servicemen in 1943. That's the same Albion Street as the Sunbeam. My post on Durham Hall – 207 Albion Street has more about the house itself.

Then there were the guns. Men coming home from New Guinea brought souvenirs, and some of them were loaded. That's why Justice Herron went out of his way to talk about "souvenirs of this war" when he sentenced Walls.

Durham Hall, a two-storey colonial house behind a garden at 207 Albion Street, Surry Hills
Durham Hall at 207 Albion Street, further along Albion Street from the Sunbeam. During the war it housed the Booker T. Washington Club for African-American servicemen. Sardaka, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

The Sunbeam After 1945

The pub kept its reputation. In 1950 a detective told the Central Court that the gunman William "Joey" Hollebone "had been battered and bashed in the Sunbeam Hotel, Surry Hills, about a week earlier by a number of men". That was in late April 1950, and the same men had smashed down his front door with an axe looking for him (Truth, 4 June 1950). His lawyer said he got a pistol to protect himself after the bashing. He was caught throwing it over a fence in a Surry Hills street at about 1.30 am on 30 April, and he got 12 months' gaol for carrying it without a licence.

The Sunbeam didn't last much longer. Mick Roberts says it closed in 1954, and Elliot Lindsay says it closed in 1953 and was demolished by 1957. The Tooth & Co. property file on the hotel at the Noel Butlin Archives runs to 1957, which fits with the end. I can't pin down the exact closing year from the papers I've seen, so it was either 1953 or 1954 depending on whose account you follow.

Today there's no pub on that corner. Frog Hollow Reserve has lawn, trees and an off-leash area, and the old stone steps still lead down into it.

Old sandstone steps with an iron handrail leading down into Frog Hollow Reserve, Surry Hills
O'Hears Steps, one of the old stone stairways down into Frog Hollow, photographed in 2011. Steps like these were how people got in and out of the hollow, and the Sunbeam stood right at the top. Sardaka, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Timeline

  • 1865: The Sunbeam Hotel is built, according to Elliot Lindsay.
  • 1895–1904: Frog Hollow, below the hotel, is known as "one of the most depraved areas of Sydney".
  • 1925: Slum clearance starts in Frog Hollow, and 295–315 Riley Street, right next to the Sunbeam, is demolished.
  • 1929–30: The council deals with demolishing the party wall of the "Sunbeam" Hotel, 317 Riley Street, during the Frog Hollow resumption.
  • 9 July 1930: City of Sydney legal opinion on "Sunbeam Hotel. Albion & Riley Sts. Tooth & Co. Ltd. Evan's Place. Easement of light and air."
  • 1943: Durham Hall, 207 Albion Street, becomes the Booker T. Washington Club, according to Lindsay.
  • Tuesday 10 April 1945, about 3 pm: A soldier and his son are drinking in the Sunbeam, according to Mrs Stapleton.
  • 10 April 1945, 6 pm: The bar door closes and the beer is "off". An argument and fight follow.
  • 10 April 1945, 6.05 pm: Arthur Graham (31) and Cecil Miller are shot dead in the public bar.
  • 11 April 1945, 2 am: Francis Alexander Walls is arrested.
  • 11 April 1945: Walls is charged at the Central Police Court with two murders and possessing an unlicensed Japanese pistol, and bail is refused.
  • Saturday 14 April 1945: An employee is held up at gunpoint on the Sunbeam's steps.
  • May 1945: The inquest opens before the Acting-Coroner, Mr Austin, and is adjourned to 6 June.
  • Late June 1945: The coroner finds Walls murdered both men and commits him for trial.
  • Monday 3 September 1945: The trial opens at the Central Criminal Court, and Walls pleads not guilty to murdering Graham.
  • Tuesday 4 September 1945: Walls is acquitted of murder and convicted of manslaughter.
  • September 1945: Mr Justice Herron sentences Walls to four years' gaol. The papers say four years, Lindsay says seven years on 12 September.
  • Late April 1950: Joey Hollebone is bashed in the Sunbeam.
  • 1953 or 1954: The Sunbeam closes. Lindsay gives 1953 and Roberts gives 1954.
  • By 1957: The hotel is demolished, according to Lindsay.
People walking dogs at dusk on the lawn of Frog Hollow Reserve, Surry Hills, under autumn trees
Frog Hollow Reserve at dusk in 2020, with people out walking their dogs. It's a lot quieter now than it was when the Sunbeam was open. Sardaka, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Who Was Who

  • Francis Alexander Walls, 46, A.M.F. private and Army cook.
  • Francis Alexander Walls (junior), his son, discharged soldier, who brought the pistol home from New Guinea.
  • Arthur John Graham, 31, City Council cleaner, of Griffin Street, Surry Hills.
  • Cecil Miller, 35 (some papers say 45), ironworker, of Bennett Place, Surry Hills.
  • Eric Stapleton, licensee, who was in the cellar at the time.
  • Mrs Louise Stapleton, the licensee's wife, and Mrs Vera Porter, her sister, both serving in the bar.
  • William Flanagan, sheet-metal worker, of Riley Street, a witness.
  • George Brian Courtney (Brian Hunt), taxi driver, of Balfour Street, Greenwich, a witness.
  • Det-Sgt Oswald Millgate and Det-Const B. Toms, police.
  • Mr Farrington, S.M., at the Central Police Court; Mr Austin, Acting-Coroner; Mr Justice Herron, the trial judge.
  • Mr Dovey, K.C. and Mr J. Bruxner, for Walls.

Where the Old Reports Don't Agree

  • Miller's age: 35 in the Herald, the Sun and Truth, but 45 in the Age, the Canberra Times and the Northern Star.
  • Walls' age: 46 in most reports, but 40 in the Canberra Times.
  • Where he was arrested: "a house in Riley Street" (Canberra Times), or his home in Darley Street, Surry Hills (Det-Sgt Millgate at the inquest).
  • When he got to the pub: about 3 pm according to Mrs Stapleton and the Age, or shortly before 6 pm according to Walls' own statement.
  • Was he kicked? Walls and his son said yes. Mrs Stapleton said "no one kicked him".
  • How many shots: two in nearly every account, or "about 14" according to Flanagan.
  • The hold-up on 14 April: the men wanted beer (Daily Mirror) or a bottle of wine (Sun).
  • The sentence: four years in Truth and the Maitland Mercury, seven years in Elliot Lindsay's 2024 article.
  • When it closed: 1953 (Lindsay) or 1954 (Roberts).

My Earlier Posts

Sources

Newspapers (via Trove, National Library of Australia)

Other sources

Pictures

  • Children playing in Hills Reserve, Frog Hollow, Surry Hills, in 1949, with old weatherboard houses and a sandstone wall behind. Ted Hood, State Library of New South Wales, no known copyright restrictions: Wikimedia Commons
  • A barmaid pulling beers in a crowded Sydney hotel bar at 6 pm in 1941. Max Dupain, public domain: Wikimedia Commons
  • A woman in an apron standing in the doorway of a corner grocery covered in hand-painted price signs, Riley and Fitzroy Streets, 1934. Sam Hood, State Library of New South Wales, public domain: Wikimedia Commons
  • A group of barefoot children in a narrow inner-Sydney lane lined with brick walls and paling fences, 1949. Ted Hood, State Library of New South Wales, no known copyright restrictions: Wikimedia Commons
  • A Japanese Nambu Type 14 pistol made in 1943, shown with its leather holster. Chris.w.braun, CC BY-SA 3.0: Wikimedia Commons
  • Durham Hall, a two-storey colonial house behind a garden at 207 Albion Street, Surry Hills. Sardaka, CC BY-SA 3.0: Wikimedia Commons
  • Royal coat of arms on the sandstone pediment of Darlinghurst Court House at sunset. Sardaka, CC BY-SA 4.0: Wikimedia Commons
  • Old sandstone steps with an iron handrail leading down into Frog Hollow Reserve, Surry Hills. Sardaka, CC BY 3.0: Wikimedia Commons
  • People walking dogs at dusk on the lawn of Frog Hollow Reserve, Surry Hills, under autumn trees. Sardaka, CC BY-SA 4.0: Wikimedia Commons

Francis Charles Kennedy and the Sophia Street Murder – Surry Hills, 1922

On a wet Saturday night in June 1922, a railway porter from Ashfield named Francis Charles Kennedy was found dead in a dark vehicle dock off Sophia Street, Surry Hills, only a few minutes' walk from Central Station. There was a deep gash on his jaw, his skull was fractured and his pockets had been turned inside out. Within days the police had arrested a local man, Frederick Reardon, and his sister Esther Eggers. The City Coroner found that Reardon had killed Kennedy and that Eggers had helped him, and sent them both for trial for murder.

That trial never happened. In August 1922 the Attorney-General refused to file a bill, and the murder charge was dropped. Reardon and Eggers did end up in gaol, but only for assaulting and trying to rob a man whose name nobody ever found out. Over a hundred years later, nobody has ever been convicted of killing Francis Kennedy. This is the story of that night, the people caught up in it, and why the case fell apart.

Sydney (Central) Railway Station, about 1917
Sydney (Central) Railway Station, dated 1917. Kennedy's train from Ashfield pulled in here at 7.33 pm on his last night. State Records NSW, no known copyright restrictions, via Wikimedia Commons

Who Was Francis Charles Kennedy?

Francis Charles Kennedy lived with his wife Hannah and their children in Orpington Street, Ashfield. He was a railway porter, and the Sydney Morning Herald said he was working at Strathfield at the time (the inquest report later called him "a railway porter at Ashfield"). The Herald first put his age at about 40, but at the inquest his widow said he was 45, and I've gone with her.

When the Evening News spoke to Hannah Kennedy two days after his death, she painted a picture of a quiet family man. He was "most reserved," she said, and wouldn't "chum up" with people in the street. The paper said he was particular about his dress, and that when he was off duty you wouldn't have taken him for a railway porter. He had a sister living at Darlinghurst and a married daughter at Randwick, but he hadn't called in on either of them that night.

"He was a most devoted father, and was always giving the children something or other," she told the reporter. She was just as firm that he was no drinker or gambler: "He was certainly not a drunkard, and beyond a small bet occasionally, he never gambled." She did admit that it only took two or three glasses of ale to leave him muddled.

Snack kiosk on the concourse at Central Railway Station in the 1920s
The kiosk at Central Railway Station in the 1920s. Kennedy was a railway porter, one of the many men who kept stations like this running. State Records NSW, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Sophia Street in 1922

If you know Surry Hills today, it's hard to picture what this corner was like a hundred years ago. Sophia Street was in the western part of Surry Hills, a short walk from Central Station. The Evening News described it as running "between Riley and Terry streets," and called it "an ill-kept, unlighted thoroughfare, about 20 feet wide," with back yards opening onto it on both sides. It was, the paper said, a "rendezvous for the 'talent' of the locality," meaning the local criminal crowd.

Truth was even blunter. A guide on a modern Surry Hills crime walk quoted its description of the street as "undoubtedly one of the most to-be-avoided sections of Sydney's underworld... an ill-kept, ill-lighted thoroughfare... a favoured haunt of some of the worst characters in Sydney."

The crime historian Elliot Lindsay, who has written the most detailed modern account of the case, describes Sophia Street as largely a service lane for the factories around it. There was the Schweppes bottling works, a big boot factory, warehouses and loading docks, with old cottages and terraces squeezed in between, plus pubs, sly-grog shops and two-up schools within easy walking distance. The dock where Kennedy died belonged to the Schweppes factory, at the back of the buildings facing Foveaux Street.

Elizabeth Street beside Belmore Park in 1920, with trams, carriages and the Tooheys Brewery stacks
Elizabeth Street beside Belmore Park in 1920, with railway works going on next to the tram tracks. The Tooheys Brewery stacks at left stood on the Surry Hills side, only a short walk from Sophia Street. City of Sydney Archives (A-00057922), CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Workmen clearing rubble in Exeter Place, Surry Hills, during the 1900 plague cleansing
Exeter Place, Surry Hills, in 1900, during the clean-up after the bubonic plague outbreak. John Degotardi Jr, Department of Public Works / State Records NSW, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

His Last Evening, Saturday 17 June 1922

Nobody knows for certain why Francis Kennedy went into the city that night. What we have comes mostly from his wife.

She told the Evening News that he'd been asleep on the Saturday afternoon. At about 6 o'clock their son went to call him for his tea and found he'd already left the house. At first she thought he'd gone to Summer Hill for a glass of ale, as he sometimes did. Then her son told her his father had said he was going out, and that he'd probably give the boy £1 for his money box when he got home. That made her think he'd gone into Sydney to collect a bet, as he had done about three weeks earlier. She thought he might have had a drink or two after collecting the money and then wandered into Sophia Street thinking he was heading back to the railway station.

That was only her best guess, and it was never proved. The times she gave also vary a little from paper to paper. At the inquest the Herald reported her as saying she last saw him at 5.30, and the Evening News's version of her evidence has him leaving home at about 6.30. The Evening News also said he'd had a haircut at a local barber before heading off.

The detectives traced him as far as Central. According to the Evening News of 20 June, he left Ashfield by train and arrived at Central Station at 7.33 pm. After that, the trail went cold.

The Body in the Vehicle Dock

Late that night a passer-by noticed a man lying on the ground in Sophia Street and went for the police. The Herald said only that it was "a civilian," while Elliot Lindsay names him as John Derley (or Durley) and says he reported it at the Regent Street police station. The papers didn't agree on the time either. The Herald said Kennedy was found "a little before midnight," and the Evening News's inquest report said about 11 pm.

He was lying in a narrow vehicle dock at the back of the Schweppes factory. He was dead and cold, and his clothes were soaked with rain. There was a deep gash on his jaw, and the base of his skull was fractured. Every one of his pockets had been turned out, and his papers and belongings were scattered around him. Pieces of a broken beer bottle lay nearby. The Evening News headline summed it up as "Man killed at Surry Hills, robbed of a few shillings." His widow said he wouldn't have had much money on him anyway, and that his gunmetal watch and chain were the only things of value he carried. "I know he would fight for the watch and chain," she said, "because I gave him the chain myself."

One small detail from the Evening News of Monday 19 June has stayed with me. That morning, the paper said, a workman walking through Sophia Street saw a little woman in the dock scrubbing the cobblestones with a large piece of wet cloth. When he looked closer he realised it was blood. It was Hannah Kennedy. "I am the woman who was mopping up the blood from the cobblestones," she told the reporter later that day. She had slipped away from her relatives and friends, gone to Mass with her daughter, and then come into town to try to find out what had happened. She had some of his blood on her handkerchief, and she said, "It is all I have got as a memory of the most devoted of husbands and the kindest of fathers."

The same day the Evening News ran photographs of Sophia Street and of the dock, with an X marking where Kennedy's head had struck the ground.

The Police Hunt

A big team was put on the case. The Evening News named Detectives Robson, Anderson, Wickham, Arnold, Comans and Missingham, along with Sergeant M'Knight and Constable Dein of the Regent Street police and Detective-Sergeant Fowler, who was visiting from Melbourne. They spent the Monday night going from house to house in Surry Hills.

There was an early false lead. The detectives were told that a man had been robbed in Terry Street at about 8 o'clock that Saturday night, and that it might have been Kennedy. It turned out to be another railway employee, who had lost a fair bit of money to some of the local "roughs" but didn't want the police involved.

On the afternoon of Tuesday 20 June the police made their move. According to the Evening News, a woman came into the Detective Office and made a long statement, and a man who was waiting outside for her was brought in too. Then the detectives went out to Maroubra, where, as the Herald put it, a man was arrested "after an exciting chase." All three were taken to the Regent Street police station. "As a result of these arrests we are now hopeful of having the whole matter satisfactorily cleared up," Detective-Sergeant Robson told the Herald.

The Accused

The three were Frederick Reardon, aged 32, his sister Esther Eggers, and a labourer named William Williamson, aged 28. The papers couldn't settle on Esther's age, which was given as 23, 25 and 26 in different reports, and the Herald even printed her first name as "Ethel" the first time round. At the inquest the Evening News described her as "a young woman, of attractive appearance," and Reardon as "a clean-shaven, sharp-featured man."

At first they were only charged with vagrancy, which let the police hold them while they kept digging. They appeared before Mr Edwards, S.M., at the Central Police Court on 21 June. Reardon complained that he'd been arrested and taken away from his work without even being allowed to wash. When they came back on Saturday 24 June he demanded bail, insisting he was an innocent man. Inspector Spyer told the court that since the first hearing Reardon and Eggers had been "positively identified as running away from the scene of the murder at 9 o'clock or shortly after." Bail was refused for the brother and sister, while Williamson was let out on bail.

On Thursday 29 June Reardon and Eggers were formally charged with the murder of Francis Kennedy. They both pleaded not guilty.

Run-down single-storey terrace cottages in Surry Hills or Redfern, 1930s
Slum houses of Surry Hills and Redfern, photographed by Ted Hood in the 1930s. Ted Hood, State Library of New South Wales, public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Inside the Coroner's Court

The inquest was held on Monday 17 July 1922 before the City Coroner, Mr Jamieson. That day the Evening News printed a photograph on its front page of Reardon and Eggers being taken into the Coroner's Court by detectives. The well-known barrister R. D. Meagher appeared for the accused, and R. M. Kidston appeared for the Crown.

The Widow

Hannah Kennedy's evidence is hard to read about. When Mr Kidston showed her a worn notebook, she broke down, grabbed it and clutched it to her. The Evening News reported her crying out, "Oh, God, what did you do it for? Oh, God, had you a heart?" Once she'd settled, she identified the notebook and other articles as her husband's. Meagher chose not to cross-examine her.

According to Elliot Lindsay, who went through the Sun and Truth reports, that notebook was the strongest evidence the police had against Reardon. Detectives said it was found among papers taken from him at the police station. They also said that when Reardon was told the widow had identified it, he started to cry and said he wanted to tell them something, then changed his mind.

The Broken Bottle

Constable Kilgannon told the court he had found pieces of a broken bottle near the body. Mr Kidston produced the neck of the bottle and admitted that it had been tested for fingerprints and that "so far there was nothing in them to connect either of the two accused."

The Dressmaker of Terry Street

The Crown's main witness was a dressmaker called Mary Smith. That's the name the Herald and the Evening News printed, though Elliot Lindsay calls her May Smith. She lived in Terry Street, near the corner of Foveaux Street. She said she had known Reardon for 18 years and his sister for two.

On the Saturday night, she said, she saw Reardon standing on one corner of Terry and Foveaux Streets and Eggers on the opposite corner. A man was with Eggers, and Eggers seemed to be either feeling in his pockets or holding him around the waist. The man tried to break away. Reardon came over, spoke to them, then struck at the man's face, and Smith heard the sound of a bottle breaking. Then she heard Eggers say, "Come on; I've got all I want," and the pair made off up Foveaux Street.

That was when Esther Eggers jumped in from the dock. The Herald reported that she "forcibly denied" the evidence, and when she was told to keep quiet she said, "I don't care; she's not going to tell lies on me." The Evening News made a real scene of it, with the Coroner looking shocked and the clerk sitting with his hands frozen over the typewriter keys.

Smith went on to say that the man who had been struck lay on the ground for a while (20 minutes in the Herald, ten in the Evening News), then got up and disappeared, and that later that night she saw him talking to a policeman. When Meagher asked why she hadn't reported it, she said that if she reported all the assaults and robberies she saw, she would be going to the police station all the time. She claimed she had seen the two accused commit about a dozen assaults before. At about 10 o'clock that night, she said, she saw Reardon and Eggers walking fast towards Terry Street, about 60 yards from the Schweppes dock where Kennedy's body was found.

The next day the Evening News ran her photograph on page one under the heading "Sees a Lot."

"Get the Lead"

Another railway man, Cyril John Leo Starkey (spelled Starkie in the later court lists), told a similar story about his own night. He met Esther Eggers in Terry Street, and she asked him, "Good night, are you looking for a girl?" While they were talking, a man walked up and said angrily, "You are the co-respondent; this is my wife." Starkey said he then felt her hand go into his pocket and take two £1 notes, and heard her call out to the man, "Get the lead." He ran for it. When he heard about Kennedy's death, he went to the police.

The Medical Evidence and the Alibis

Dr Stratford Sheldon, who did the post-mortem, said the wound on the right side of Kennedy's chin could have been caused by a blow from a beer bottle. He said it was possible the skull fracture happened when Kennedy fell, and that the fractured skull and laceration of the brain were the cause of death. (The Herald's first report had put the gash on his left jaw, but the doctor's evidence says the right side.)

Detective Francis Anderson produced a statement from Reardon saying he'd had a few drinks earlier in the day and gone to bed at the Coffee Palace in Castlereagh Street between 7 and 8 pm. Elliot Lindsay notes that the manager there said Reardon didn't come in until about 10.45 pm, and that he was drunk. Williamson's statement said he had been with Eggers until 11 o'clock that night. Sergeant M'Knight said Reardon had told him, "I want you to see Esther. I think she wants to clear me." He also said Eggers had admitted her first statement "was all lies," but then refused to make a new one until she had seen her solicitor.

The Coroner's Finding

The Coroner found that Kennedy died from injuries he got when Frederick Reardon struck him on the head, and that Esther Eggers aided and abetted him. He found that they had "feloniously and maliciously murdered" Kennedy, and committed both of them for trial at the Central Criminal Court, set down for 4 September.

The old Coroner's Court building at 102-104 George Street, The Rocks
The old Coroner's Court at 102–104 George Street, The Rocks. It was built in 1907–08 and was used for coronial work until 1971, so it was the City Coroner's court in 1922. Collywolly, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

The Murder Charge Is Dropped

The case never got to that court. On Thursday 17 August 1922, at the Darlinghurst Sessions before Judge Cohen, the Crown Prosecutor, Mr Weigall, announced that the Attorney-General had declined to file a bill against Reardon and Eggers for murder. The Evening News put it on its front page under the heading "No Bill." The same morning the brother and sister pleaded not guilty to a different charge, assaulting Cyril John Lee Starkie and robbing him of £2 on 17 June. They were let out on bail of £40.

No reasons were published. When you put the evidence side by side, though, the gaps are easy to see, and Elliot Lindsay sets them out well:

  • Nobody saw Kennedy with Reardon or Eggers that night.
  • The fingerprints on the bottle didn't point to either of them.
  • Mary Smith never said the man she saw struck was Kennedy. By her own account, he got up, walked off and was later talking to a policeman. Kennedy, with a fractured skull, was found dead where he fell.
  • The attack she described happened at the corner of Terry and Foveaux Streets. Kennedy's body was in the Schweppes dock in Sophia Street, and she didn't see anyone go in there.
  • The notebook linked Reardon to Kennedy's belongings, but it didn't show how he got it, or that he was the one who struck the blow.
Royal coat of arms on the sandstone pediment of Darlinghurst Court House at sunset
The coat of arms over Darlinghurst Court House. The murder charge was dropped at the Darlinghurst Sessions in August 1922, and both assault trials were heard at Quarter Sessions. Sardaka, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Two Trials Over an Unknown Man

The Crown didn't let the pair go, though. On 26 October 1922 Reardon and Eggers went on trial at Quarter Sessions, both pleading not guilty to assaulting "a person whose name is unknown, at Sydney, on June 17, with intent to rob him," with a second count of common assault. In other words, this was the man Mary Smith said she saw knocked down on the corner, not Kennedy. R. D. Meagher defended them again. The jury couldn't agree and was locked up for the night, and in the end it failed to reach a verdict.

They were tried again in November before Judge Cohen, with L. J. McKean prosecuting and W. D. McMahon appearing for Eggers. Elliot Lindsay says Reardon ran his own defence this time and called witnesses for an alibi. This jury found them both guilty. The Herald of Friday 24 November reported that Reardon was sentenced to 18 months' hard labour in Bathurst Gaol, and Eggers to nine months' light labour in the State Reformatory.

I couldn't find out what happened to the separate charge of robbing Cyril Starkie. William Williamson had his own troubles. In late July the Evening News reported that he was convicted at the Darlinghurst Sessions of being an accessory after the fact to an earlier robbery Eggers had committed in 1921, when a man named Jack Lowey lost £15 after a night of drinking in Terry Lane and dancing at a cottage in Maroubra. Lindsay also notes that Williamson later claimed the detectives had pressured him to change his story. The police denied it.

Still Unsolved

So who killed Francis Kennedy? The honest answer is that nobody knows. A jury decided that Reardon and Eggers attacked and tried to rob a man in those same streets that night, and Reardon may well have ended up with Kennedy's notebook. Maybe they did kill him. But the man Mary Smith saw get up and walk away can't have been Kennedy, and once the murder charge was dropped, the Crown itself treated her evidence as being about someone else. If her picture of the neighbourhood was anywhere near true, there were plenty of other people around who robbed drunk or lost men after dark.

According to Elliot Lindsay, by May 1924 Truth was listing Kennedy's death among the murder mysteries that had beaten the CIB. His article sums it up as a case that went "from apparent solution into enduring mystery," and I think that's fair. It's sad to think of Hannah Kennedy getting her husband's notebook back in a crowded courtroom and never finding out who took it from him.

The lane is still there. When a reporter from The Senior went on a Surry Hills crime walk in 2020, the guide took the group down the narrow lane where Kennedy was killed. Apart from some roller doors, the reporter wrote, it didn't look much different from a 1922 photograph in the guide's folder. Next time you're walking up from Central towards Surry Hills, it's worth sparing a thought for a quiet railway porter from Ashfield who never made it back to his train.

Timeline

  • Saturday 17 June 1922: Francis Charles Kennedy leaves home in Orpington Street, Ashfield, late in the afternoon. He arrives at Central Station at 7.33 pm. That night he is found dead in the Schweppes vehicle dock off Sophia Street, Surry Hills.
  • Monday 19 June: The Herald and the Evening News report the death as murder. Hannah Kennedy is found scrubbing his blood from the cobblestones.
  • Tuesday 20 June: Frederick Reardon is arrested at Maroubra after a chase. Esther Eggers and William Williamson are also detained, and all three are taken to the Regent Street police station.
  • Wednesday 21 June: The three appear at the Central Police Court on vagrancy charges, and bail is refused.
  • Saturday 24 June: They are remanded again, charged as idle and disorderly. The police say Reardon and Eggers were seen running from the scene. Williamson gets bail.
  • Thursday 29 June: Reardon and Eggers are charged with murder and plead not guilty.
  • Monday 17 July: At the inquest before the City Coroner, Mr Jamieson, they are found to have murdered Kennedy and are committed for trial at the Central Criminal Court on 4 September.
  • Thursday 17 August: At the Darlinghurst Sessions the Crown announces the Attorney-General has declined to file a bill, and the murder charge is dropped. The pair plead not guilty to robbing Cyril Starkie.
  • 26 October: At their first trial for assaulting an unknown man with intent to rob, the jury can't agree.
  • November 1922: At the retrial before Judge Cohen they are found guilty. Reardon gets 18 months' hard labour in Bathurst Gaol and Eggers nine months in the State Reformatory (reported 24 November).
  • May 1924: Truth lists the killing of Kennedy among Sydney's unsolved murder mysteries.

My Earlier Posts

Sources

Newspapers (Trove, National Library of Australia)

Other sources

Pictures

  • All pictures are from Wikimedia Commons. The photographer or archive and the licence are shown under each one.

The Shooting of Annie Wilson – 195 Bourke Street, Woolloomooloo – 1893

On a Thursday afternoon in January 1893, a young married woman named Annie Wilson was shot in the kitchen of a lodging house at 195 Bourke Street. In 1893 the papers called that part of Bourke Street Woolloomooloo; today it's the Darlinghurst end of the street, down near William Street. The man who fired the shot was Simon Peter Van Kaspelen, a well-known Dutch-born crayon portrait artist who lodged in the same house. After shooting Annie he went upstairs, locked himself in his room and shot himself. Annie died a little before two o'clock. She was 26.

Because the man who killed her was dead, there was no arrest, no trial and no hanging at Darlinghurst Gaol. There was an inquest the next morning in a pub on the corner of Bourke and William Streets, a funeral to the Necropolis at Rookwood the day after that, and then the story faded from the papers. This post sets out what the 1893 papers actually said about Annie, her household, the man who killed her and the days that followed. Where the old reports and the modern write-ups don't agree, I've said so.

Woolloomooloo Bay, Sydney, photographed by Fred Hardie in 1892
Woolloomooloo Bay as Annie would have known it, photographed by Fred Hardie in 1892–93. Bourke Street climbs the hill from the bay up through Darlinghurst. Fred Hardie for George Washington Wilson & Co., State Library of New South Wales, no known copyright restrictions, via Wikimedia Commons

Where It Happened – 195 Bourke Street

Bourke Street is a long one. It starts down at Woolloomooloo, climbs the hill through Darlinghurst past William Street and Oxford Street, then runs on through Surry Hills towards Redfern. In January 1893 the Sydney Morning Herald described number 195 as being in "Bourke-street, Woolloomooloo", and called the house "a substantially-built two-story lodging-house belonging to Mrs. De Monti". The inquest and the funeral notices give the same address. Today that stretch is counted as Darlinghurst, which is why the modern accounts of the case call it a Darlinghurst story.

So where does Surry Hills come into it? There are a few threads. About four weeks before the shooting, Van Kaspelen's wife Edith had left him and moved to 639 Bourke Street, Surry Hills, further up the same street. The doctor who was called to the house, Dr Alexander Dewar, had his rooms at 81 Crown Street, which runs between Woolloomooloo, Darlinghurst and Surry Hills. And when local writer Elliot Lindsay retold the case in 2023 for Neighbourhood Media, the piece went out under the heading "True Crime in Surry Hills", even though the article itself places the house in Darlinghurst. So it's easy to see how it has come to be remembered as a Surry Hills story.

The Wesleyan Chapel in Bourke Street, Sydney, photographed in 1872
The Wesleyan Chapel in Bourke Street, photographed in 1872. It still stands on the Surry Hills–Darlinghurst stretch of the street, the same street where Edith Van Kaspelen took lodgings at number 639. Charles Percy Pickering, NSW Government Printing Office, State Library of New South Wales, public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Who Was Annie Wilson?

We don't know as much about Annie as I'd like. What we have comes from her family's evidence at the inquest and the funeral notices they placed in the paper.

Her full name was Annie Godlington Wilson. Three of the five funeral notices print it as "Codlington", which looks like a slip at the printer's, since the news reports, the inquest and the other two notices all have "Godlington". She was born in London and was 26 years old. Her brother, George James Edwards, told the inquest she "was of temperate habits" and that she left "neither children nor property".

Annie was married to Joseph Wilson, a French polisher who worked for Nicholson and Co. in George Street. The couple lived at 195 Bourke Street, and with the owner away, Annie was looking after the house. The funeral notices give us a glimpse of the family around her: her husband, her brother George, Joseph's brothers John and James Wilson, and two couples, Mr and Mrs James Bickerstaff and Mr and Mrs Golding, whose notices call Annie a sister-in-law. She clearly had plenty of people who cared about her.

George Street, Sydney, photographed by Fred Hardie in 1892-93
George Street in 1892–93. Annie's husband Joseph worked as a French polisher for Nicholson and Co. in George Street. Fred Hardie for George Washington Wilson & Co., State Library of New South Wales, no known copyright restrictions, via Wikimedia Commons

The Household at 195 Bourke Street

The house belonged to a Mrs De Monti. (The Herald spelt it "De Monti" in its main report and "De Monté" elsewhere.) She had gone up to Liverpool with her husband, who was in poor health, and had left the place in Annie's care while she was away.

Living there at the time were Annie and Joseph, Annie's brother George Edwards, Simon Van Kaspelen, and, according to George, "three single young men" who had been out all that morning. Van Kaspelen and his wife had been lodging there for about seven months. Mrs Van Kaspelen and Annie were friends, and Edith still called in to see her after she'd left her husband.

George Edwards worked as a collector for the Citizens' Life Assurance Company. He last saw his sister alive at twenty past nine on the Thursday morning, before he went out for the day.

Simon Peter Van Kaspelen and Edith

Van Kaspelen was a native of Amsterdam. Edith told the inquest he was 43. By trade he was a crayon artist, making large portraits in French crayon from photographs, and he was very good at it. His agent was W. Aldenhoven of Hunter Street, who told the Herald that Van Kaspelen had been his principal artist in that line for nine years, and that "portraits had even been sent out from London for him to enlarge".

Sober, he was by all accounts a gentleman. Aldenhoven said "when Van Kaspelen was sober there was not a more gentlemanly man", that he was educated and spoke four languages. Drunk, it was another matter. About three months before the shooting, in a drunken rage, he had seized Aldenhoven by the throat, and only the workmen stepping in had stopped it. After that Aldenhoven banned him from the shop and sent the work out to him instead.

Edith had been married to him for ten years. They had no children. About four weeks before the shooting she left him "on account of his drunkenness and cruelty towards me" and took lodgings at 639 Bourke Street, Surry Hills. She said he had often threatened to shoot her. On the Wednesday, the day before he killed Annie, he had told her: "If I had a revolver I would shoot you." Edith's own sister had been so worried that she told her to get out of the city altogether, "because she said she was sure Mr. Van Kaspelen was going mad, he looked so bad with drink". Edith said she didn't know he actually carried a revolver.

She still spoke of him with some tenderness. "We had been married 10 years," she told the Herald, "and but for the drink we should have lived very happily together."

Thursday, 12 January 1893

The Shooting

Nobody saw what happened in that kitchen. What we know was pieced together afterwards from what was found in the house.

Van Kaspelen had gone out early that morning. At some point around one o'clock he came back, and the police and the papers took it that he had been drinking. Annie was in the kitchen at the back of the house. He shot her once in the face at close range. Then, it seems, he turned the revolver on himself. One shot went through the top of his own hard felt hat and lodged in the kitchen ceiling. Another grazed his temple. Bleeding, he went up the stairs to his room, which was both his bedroom and his studio, locked the door, lay on the bed and fired again, this time into his forehead.

The gun was a seven-chambered revolver. When the police checked it, four chambers had been fired, two were still loaded and one had never been loaded.

The Discovery

At about twenty-five past one, George Edwards came home and found Edith Van Kaspelen standing at the street door. She'd come to visit Annie and had been knocking for about five minutes without an answer. George had a key, and they went in together.

He noticed spots of blood on the floor of the passage and followed them to the kitchen. Annie was lying on her back on the floor. In George's words at the inquest, "Blood was coming from her mouth, and her left eye was black. She was not dead, but she could not speak. She was just gasping". He told Edith to run for a doctor and dashed off to a chemist's shop nearby for help. Edith ran out into the street but came straight back. As she told the Herald, "I did not like to leave Mrs. Wilson when she was not yet dead."

When George came back with the chemist they saw Van Kaspelen's hat and pipe lying on the kitchen floor. George knew the hat at once. He ran upstairs, found Van Kaspelen's door locked and burst it open. Van Kaspelen was lying dead across the bed, with the revolver beside his left hand.

Crown Street, Sydney, seen from above near William Street in 2003
Crown Street in 2003, seen from above near William Street. In 1893 Dr Alexander Dewar, who attended Annie, had his rooms at 81 Crown Street. Photo by Cookaa, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

The Police and the Doctor

Senior-constable Thomas O'Keefe of No. 3 police station got to the house at about half past one. Annie was still alive but unconscious. He went upstairs, took charge of the revolver, and traced the drops of blood from the kitchen up the stairs to the bedroom. He found "no sign of any struggle whatever", and George said nothing in the house had been disturbed.

Dr Alexander Dewar of 81 Crown Street told the inquest he was called to the house at about half past one. He found Annie bleeding from the nose and mouth, with a wound in the left eye socket beside the tear bone that was blackened with gunpowder, which shows the gun was fired from very close. The bullet had gone into the brain. By his account she was still alive but unconscious when he arrived, and she died about twenty minutes later, close to two o'clock. Dr Dewar told the inquest the cause of death was "unquestionably the wound in the eye", and that he could find "no other injury whatever".

Upstairs, he found that Van Kaspelen had a compound fracture over the right brow, also blackened with powder, which was the fatal wound, and a second, shallower wound on the left brow with pieces of lead in it.

The Inquest at the Burdekin Hotel

In those days inquests were often held in a pub close to where someone died, and this one opened at ten o'clock the next morning, Friday 13 January, at the Burdekin Hotel, which the Herald placed on the corner of Bourke and William Streets. The City Coroner presided. Because Van Kaspelen was a Dutch citizen, the Acting Consul of the Netherlands, Señor Don Horacio Amora, came along on behalf of his government.

Before it started, a constable handed the coroner a note that had been found in Van Kaspelen's room. The coroner read it and said it "was of a private character and had no bearing on the inquest". What it said was never published.

The jury went to the house to see the scene and view the bodies, then came back to hear the evidence.

The Evidence

Edith Van Kaspelen spoke first. She described the threats, the drinking and the separation, and said that as far as she knew her husband "had never had any quarrel with Mrs. Wilson". George Edwards told the story of coming home and finding his sister, and said he had never known Van Kaspelen to quarrel with Annie either. He also told the jury: "Mrs. Wilson and Mrs. Van Kaspelen were very much alike in general appearance."

The Verdict

The jury didn't take long. They returned a verdict that Annie Godlington Wilson and Simon Peter Van Kaspelen "had died from the effects of pistol-shot wounds inflicted by Van Kaspelen".

With the killer dead, there was nobody to arrest or put on trial, and that was as far as the law could go.

The Funeral – To the Necropolis

On Saturday 14 January the Herald carried a column of funeral notices for Annie, one after another, from her husband, her brother and each branch of the family. Her husband's read:

THE FRIENDS of Mr. JOSEPH WILSON are respectfully invited to attend the Funeral of his dearly beloved WIFE, Annie Codlington; to move from 195 Bourke-street, THIS (Saturday) AFTERNOON, at a quarter-past 1 o'clock, for the Necropolis.
(Sydney Morning Herald, 14 January 1893)

So Annie left the house where she had died almost exactly two days after she was shot, and was taken out to the Necropolis at Rookwood, the big cemetery that had replaced the old Devonshire Street burial ground. The undertaker was Mrs P. Kirby of 88 Hunter Street, with a branch in William Street. The notices don't say how the mourners got there, but in those years a great many Sydney funerals bound for the Necropolis went out on the mortuary train from the Regent Street Mortuary Station.

Funeral train at No. 1 Mortuary Railway Station, Rookwood Cemetery, around 1865
A funeral train standing at No. 1 Mortuary Station inside Rookwood Cemetery, dated around 1865 by NSW State Archives. Trains like this carried coffins and mourners out to the Necropolis. NSW State Archives and Records, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Platform arcade of No. 1 Mortuary Railway Station, Rookwood Cemetery
The stone platform arcade at No. 1 Mortuary Station, Rookwood, where funeral parties stepped off the train at the Necropolis (undated photograph). NSW State Archives and Records, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

How the Papers Reported It

The shooting was in the papers the very next morning. On Friday 13 January the Sydney Morning Herald ran a long report under the heading "SHOCKING TRAGEDY IN WOOLLOOMOOLOO. MURDER AND SUICIDE.", along with separate pieces headed "Statement by Mr. Edwards", "Statement of Mrs. Van Kaspelen", "Statement by the Husband of the Murdered Woman" and "The Character and Ability of the Murderer". Its summary of the day's news put it plainly: "Mrs. Annie Godlington Wilson was shot dead by S. P. Van Kaspelen, a well known crayon artist, who mistook her for his wife."

Joseph Wilson's statement was short: he too "was of opinion that Van Kaspelen had mistaken Mrs. Wilson for his wife". George Edwards agreed. In the Herald's account of what he said, the two women "were alike in build and stature, and in the colour of their hair, and might easily have been mistaken for one another, even at only a few yards distance."

On Saturday 14 January the Herald reported the inquest in full under "THE WOOLLOOMOOLOO TRAGEDY. THE INQUEST AND VERDICT." According to Elliot Lindsay, other papers took a different line. He quotes the Daily Telegraph as saying it was "scarcely feasible" that Van Kaspelen would shoot another woman in broad daylight thinking she was his wife, and suggesting he had been seized with "an insane idea of revenge on the woman who he discovered was befriending the wife who had left him".

A Modern Theory – Were Annie and Edith More Than Friends?

This next part is a modern claim, not something anyone proved in 1893, and I'm including it so you know it's out there.

In 2023 Elliot Lindsay wrote up the case twice, for Murders Most Foul and for Neighbourhood Media. He argues that Annie and Edith were in a same-sex relationship, that Van Kaspelen shot Annie on purpose out of jealousy, and that Edith, Annie's husband and her brother kept the relationship quiet afterwards. He quotes Truth as reporting that Van Kaspelen complained his wife "entertained a high and unusually affectionate regard" for Annie, and that Annie was "too intimate with Mrs Van Kaspelen". The case also turns up in the 2008 book Homophobia: An Australian History, edited by Shirleene Robinson.

Against that, here's the 1893 evidence. The three people closest to it, Annie's husband Joseph, her brother George and Edith herself, all told the papers they believed it was a case of mistaken identity. George and Edith both said Van Kaspelen had never quarrelled with Annie, and George told the inquest the two women looked very much alike. The jury's verdict said nothing either way about why he did it.

The honest answer is that we can't know what was going on in Van Kaspelen's head that afternoon. Whatever his reason was, Annie did nothing to deserve what happened to her.

Where the Accounts Differ

A few details don't line up between the reports, so here's how they stand.

  • Annie's age. The computer-read text of the Herald on Trove makes her "about 12" in one place and "20" in another, and Lindsay gives her age as 26. I checked the page images of the 13 and 14 January papers, and both clearly say 26: Edith said "about 26 years of age" and George told the inquest "Mrs. Wilson was 26 years of age". The 12 and 20 are just scanning errors.
  • Which eye. The Herald's first report on 13 January said the bullet hole was "just above the right eye". At the inquest the next day, George Edwards, Senior-constable O'Keefe and Dr Dewar all said it was the left eye, and the doctor described the wound as being in the left eye socket. I've gone with the inquest evidence.
  • How many wounds. Lindsay writes that Annie had two gunshot wounds to the face. Dr Dewar told the inquest there was "no other injury whatever" apart from the wound in the eye. The second bullet wound he described above the brow was on Van Kaspelen, not Annie.
  • The time of death. Lindsay says police recorded her death at 1.55 pm. I couldn't find that exact time in the 1893 papers. The Herald said "it was not till nearly 2 o'clock that she died", so the two are close.
  • Whether the doctor found her alive. The Herald's first report said Dr Dewar arrived "shortly before 2 o'clock" and that by then "life was extinct". At the inquest Dr Dewar himself said he was called at about half past one, that Annie was still alive but unconscious when he got there, and that she died about twenty minutes later. I've gone with the doctor's sworn evidence.
  • Van Kaspelen's age. Edith gave his age as 43 both to the Herald and at the inquest. Design and Art Australia Online gives his birth year as 1849, which fits roughly. Lindsay describes Edith as 36 and her husband as ten years older, which would make him 46.
  • The suburb. Woolloomooloo in 1893, Darlinghurst today, and remembered by some as Surry Hills, for the reasons given at the top of this post.

A Year of Bad News on Bourke Street

Annie's death wasn't the only one on Bourke Street that year. On 26 March 1893 a woman named Emma Harrison was found dead in her lodgings on the corner of Burton and Bourke Streets in Darlinghurst. That case did go to trial: George Archer was convicted of her murder and hanged at Darlinghurst Gaol on 11 July 1893. You can read about him and the other executions there in my post on the Hangings at Darlinghurst Gaol, and about the gaol itself in Darlinghurst Gaol & Darlinghurst Court. If Van Kaspelen had lived, a murder charge against him would have been heard in the Central Criminal Court at Darlinghurst, right beside the gaol.

Watercolour of Darlinghurst Gaol by Henry Louis Bertrand, 1891
Darlinghurst Gaol in a watercolour signed by Henry Louis Bertrand in 1891, two years before Annie's death. Bertrand had himself been convicted of the murder of Henry Kinder. Henry Louis Bertrand, State Library of New South Wales, public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Timeline

DateWhat happened
About 1883Simon Peter Van Kaspelen and Edith marry (she said in 1893 they had been married ten years).
About 1884Van Kaspelen begins working for art dealer W. Aldenhoven of Hunter Street (nine years by 1893).
About June 1892The Van Kaspelens take lodgings at 195 Bourke Street, Woolloomooloo (about seven months before the shooting).
About October 1892Drunk, Van Kaspelen seizes Aldenhoven by the throat and is banned from the shop.
About mid-December 1892Edith leaves him and moves to 639 Bourke Street, Surry Hills.
Wednesday 11 January 1893Van Kaspelen tells Edith, "If I had a revolver I would shoot you."
Thursday 12 January 1893, 9.20 amGeorge Edwards last sees his sister alive.
12 January, about 1 pmVan Kaspelen shoots Annie in the kitchen, then shoots himself upstairs.
12 January, about 1.25 pmGeorge Edwards and Edith Van Kaspelen find Annie on the kitchen floor.
12 January, about 1.30 pmSenior-constable O'Keefe arrives and Dr Dewar is called.
12 January, nearly 2 pmAnnie Godlington Wilson dies, aged 26.
Friday 13 January 1893The Herald reports the "Shocking Tragedy in Woolloomooloo". Inquest at the Burdekin Hotel, Bourke and William Streets; verdict of death from pistol-shot wounds inflicted by Van Kaspelen.
Saturday 14 January 1893Inquest reported in the Herald. Annie's funeral leaves 195 Bourke Street at 1.15 pm for the Necropolis, Rookwood.
2023Elliot Lindsay retells the case for Murders Most Foul and Neighbourhood Media.

Related Posts On My Blog

Sources

Newspapers, 1893 (via Trove, National Library of Australia)

Later accounts

Pictures

  • All pictures are from Wikimedia Commons, with the original holders, licences and links given under each picture.